APPENDIX
Verdicts on the ahadith mentioned in the Foreword
- Mutawatir, as declared by many scholars, including
Ibn Taimiyyah, al-Suyuti, Najm al-Din al-Iskandari (d. 981) and al-'Ijlouni
(d. 1162). About this hadith, al-Daraqutni said, "It is the most authentic
one regarding the virtues of any surah." It is related by al-Bukhari,
Muslim and others.
- The following is the sahih hadith of al- Bukhari,
Muslim, al-Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah and Ibn 'Asakir: "Verily, Allah has Ninety-Nine
Names which if a person safeguards them, he will enter the Garden."
In some narrations of this hadith found in al-Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah, al-Hakim
and others, the names are listed at the end; however, at least three
different listings are given, e.g. one list being, "He is Allah, besides
whom there is no other deity, the Merciful, the Compassionate, ...,
the Forbearing" while another is "Allah, the Unique, the Absolute, ...,
the One who has nothing like unto Him." It is agreed that these latter
narrations are da'if, and this is why al-Bukhari and Muslim did not
include them in their Sahihs. Al-Tirmidhi says in his Sunan, "This (version
of the) hadith is gharib; it has been narrated from various routes on
the authority of Abu Hurairah, but we do not know of the mention of
the Names in the numerous narrations, except this one." Ibn Taimiyyah
says, "Al-Walid (one of the narrators of the hadith) related the Names
from (the saying of) one of his Syrian teachers ... specific mention
of the Names is not from the words of the Prophet (may Allah bless him
and grant him peace), by the agreement of those familiar with Hadith."87
Ibn Kathir says in his Tafsir, under verse 180 of Surah al- A'raf, that
these narrations are mudraj. Ibn Hajar takes a similar view in his commentary
on Sahih al-Bukhari. Various scholars have given different lists of
99 Names from their study of the Qur'an and Sunnah, including Ja'far
al- Sadiq, Sufyan b. 'Uyainah, Ibn Hazm, al-Qurtubi, Ibn Hajar and Salih
b. 'Uthaimin.
- Ibn Taimiyyah says, "It is not from the words of
the Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace), and there is
no known isnad for it, neither sahih nor da'if"; al-Zarkashi (d. 794),
Ibn Hajar, al-Suyuti and others agreed with him. Al-Qari says, "But
its meaning is correct, deduced from the statement of Allah, I have
not created the Jinn and Mankind, except to worship Me, i.e. to recognise/know
me, as Ibn 'Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both) has explained."
These statements are mentioned by al-'Ijlouni, who adds, "This saying
occurs often in the words of the Sufis, who have relied on it and built
upon it some of their principles."88
- Al-'Ijlouni says, "Al-Saghani (d. 650) said: Maudu'.
I say: But its meaning is correct, even if it is not a hadith." no.
2123. 'Ali al- Qari says, "But its meaning is correct, for al- Dailami
has related from Ibn 'Abbas as marfu': 'that Jibril came to me and said:
O Muhammad! Were it not for you, the Garden would not have been created,
and were it not for you, the Fire would not have been created', and
in the narration of Ibn 'Asakir: 'Were it not for you, the world would
not have been created'." Al- Albani also quotes al-Saghani's verdict,
and comments on al-Qari's words thus, "It is not appropriate to certify
the correctness of its meaning without establishing the authenticity
of the narration from al-Dailami, which is something I have not found
any of the scholars to have addressed. Personally, although I have not
come across its isnad, I have no doubt about its weakness; enough of
an indication for us is that al-Dailami is alone in reporting it. As
for the narration of Ibn 'Asakir, Ibn al-Jauzi also related it in a
long marfu' hadith from Salman and said, 'It is maudu', and al-Suyuti
endorsed this in al-La'ali."89
- Sahih - related by al-Bukhari and Muslim.
- Al-'Ijlouni says, "Al-Ghazali mentioned it in Ihya'
'Ulum al-Din with the wording, Allah says, "Neither My heaven nor My
earth could contain Me, but the soft, humble heart of my believing slave
can contain Me." Al-'Iraqi said in his notes on Al-Ihya', "I do not
find a basis (i.e. isnad) for it", and al-Suyuti agreed with him, following
al-Zarkashi. Al-'Iraqi then said, "But in the hadith of Abu 'Utbah in
al-Tabarani there occurs: ... the vessels of your Lord are the hearts
of His righteous slaves, and the most beloved to Him are the softest
and most tender ones." Ibn Taimiyyah said, "It is mentioned in the Israelite
traditions, but there is no known isnad from the Prophet (may Allah
bless him and grant him peace) for it." Al-Sakhawi said in Al- Maqasid,
following his shaykh al-Suyuti in Al- La'ali, "There is no known isnad
from the Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) for it, and
its meaning is that his heart can contain belief in Me, love of Me and
gnosis of Me. But as for the one who says that Allah incarnates in the
hearts of the people, then he is more of an infidel than the Christians,
who specified that to Christ alone. It seems that Ibn Taimiyyah's mention
of Israelite tradition refers to what Ahmad has related in Al-Zuhd from
Wahb b. Munabbih who said that Allah opened the heavens for Ezekiel
until he saw the Throne, so Ezekiel said, 'How Perfect are You! How
Mighty are You, O Lord!' So Allah said, 'Truly, the heavens and the
earth were too weak to contain Me, but the soft, humble heart of my
believing slave contains Me'." He also quoted from al- Zarkashi's writing
that one of the scholars said that it is a false hadith, fabricated
by a renegade (from the religion), and that it is most-often quoted
by a preacher to the masses, 'Ali b. Wafa, for his own purposes, who
says at the time of spiritual rapture and dance, "Go round the House
of your Lord." He further said that al-Tabarani has related from Abu
'Utbah al- Khawlani as marfu', "Truly, Allah has vessels from amongst
the people of the earth, and the vessels of your Lord are the hearts
of his righteous slaves, and the most beloved of them to Him are the
softest and most tender ones"; in its isnad is Baqiyyah b. al-Walid,
a mudallis, but he has clearly stated hearing the hadith."90
Al-Albani rates this last hadith mentioned as hasan.91
- Al-Nawawi said, "It is not established." Ibn Taimiyyah
said, "Maudu'." Al-Sam'ani said, "It is not known as marfu', but it
is quoted as a statement of Yahya b. Mu'adh al-Razi." Al- Suyuti endorsed
al-Nawawi's words, and also said, "This hadith is not authentic." Al-
Fairozabadi said, "It is not a Prophetic statement, although most of
the people think it is a hadith, but it is not authentic at all. In
fact, it is only related in the Israelite traditions: O Man! Know yourself:
you will know your Lord." Ibn al-Gharas said, after quoting al-Nawawi's
verdict, "... but the books of the Sufis, such as Shaykh Muhi al-Din
Ibn 'Arabi and others, are filled with it, being quoted like a hadith."
Ibn 'Arabi also said, "This hadith, although it is not proved by way
of narration, is proved to us by way of Kashf ('unveiling', while in
a trance)."92 Regarding this methodology, al-Albani
says, "Authenticating ahadith by way of Kashf is a wicked innovation
of the Sufis, and depending upon it leads to the authentication of false,
baseless ahadith ... This is because, even at the best of times, Kashf
is like opinion, which may be right or wrong - and that is if no personal
desires enter into it! We ask Allah to save us from it, and from everything
with which He is not pleased."93
- Sahih. Related by Malik in Al-Muwatta', al- Shafi'i
in Al-Risalah (p. 110, Eng. trans.) and Muslim (1:382; Eng. trans. 1:272).
This was the first of two questions which the Prophet (may Allah bless
him and grant him peace) put to a slave-girl to test her faith, the
second one being, "Who am I?" She answered, "Above the heaven" and "You
are the Messenger of Allah" respectively, to which he said, "Free her,
for she is a believer." Her first answer, which is found in the Qur'an
(67:16-17, the word fi can mean 'above/on', as in 6:11, 20:71 & 27:8),
means that Allah is above and separate from His creation, not mixed
in with it, the erroneous belief which leads to worship of creation.
- Maudu', as stated by al-Saghani and others. Scholars
differ as to whether its meaning is correct or not, in what way, and
to what extent.94 It is sometimes used to justify
divisive, anti- Islamic nationalism and patriotism!
- Sahih. Related by Malik as mursal/mu'allaq/balaghat
(depending on choice of terminology), and related twice as musnad by
al- Hakim. The meaning of the hadith is contained in the Qur'an, in
the mention of the Book and Wisdom (2:129, 2:151, 2:231, 3:164, 4:113,
33:34 & 62:2); al-Shafi'i says, "I have heard the most knowledgeable
people about the Qur'an say that the Wisdom is the Sunnah" (Al-Risalah,
Eng. trans., p. 111).
- Sahih. Related by al-Tirmidhi, Ahmad, Ibn Abi
'Asim, al-Hakim, al-Tabarani, al-Dailami and al-Tahawi.95
The phrase Ahl al-Bayt (members of the house) refers: (i) primarily
to the Prophet's wives (may Allah bless him and grant him peace), from
the clear context of the relevant verse of the Qur'an (33:33); (ii)
to 'Ali, Fatimah, Hasan & Husain, from the "hadith of the garment" (cf.
Sahih Muslim, Book of the Virtues of the Companions). It is imbalanced
and unjust to exclude either of these categories from the hadith.
- A sahih hadith related by Abu Dawud, al- Tirmidhi,
Ibn Majah & Ahmad, and well-known amongst the people. The fullest narration
is, "Abu Bakr will be in the Garden; 'Umar will be in the Garden; 'Uthman
will be in the Garden; 'Ali will be in the Garden; Talhah will be in
the Garden; al-Zubair will be in the Garden; 'Abd al-Rahman b. 'Auf
will be in the Garden; Sa'd b. Abi Waqqas will be in the Garden; Sa'id
b. Zaid will be in the Garden; Abu 'Ubaidah b. al-Jarrah will be in
the Garden."
- Related by Ishaq b. Rahawaih and al-Baihaqi with
a sahih isnad as a statement of 'Umar. It is also collected by Ibn 'Adi
and al-Dailami from Ibn 'Umar as marfu', but in its isnad is 'Isa b.
Abdullah, who is weak. However, it is strengthened by another narration
of Ibn 'Adi, and also supported by the hadith in the Sunan that a man
saw in a dream that Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace)
was weighed against Abu Bakr, and was found to be heavier; then Abu
Bakr was weighed against everyone else ...96
- Related by al-Hakim, al-Tabarani and others. It
is also related by al-Tirmidhi with the wording, "I am the House of
Wisdom, and 'Ali is its Door". Al-Daraqutni labelled the hadith as mudtarib,
both in isnad and text; al-Tirmidhi said it is gharib and munkar; al-Bukhari
said that it has no sahih narration; Ibn Ma'in said that it is a baseless
lie. Similar dismissals of the hadith are reported from Abu Zur'ah,
Abu Hatim and Yahya b. Sa'd. Al-Hakim declared the original hadith as
sahih in isnad, but Ibn al- Jauzi regarded both versions as maudu',
and al- Dhahabi agreed with him. Several of the later scholars, including
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani, Ibn Hajar al-Makki and al-Suyuti declared it
hasan due to its various routes of narration. Al- 'Ijlouni says, "...
none of this devalues the consensus of the Adherents to the Sunnah from
the Companions, the Successors and those after them, that the best of
the Companions overall is Abu Bakr, followed by 'Umar ...", and quotes
this view from Ibn 'Umar and 'Ali himself, as recorded in Sahih al-Bukhari.97
Al-Albani declares the hadith to be maudu'.98
- A da'if or maudu' hadith, as stated by Ahmad b.
Hanbal, Ibn 'Abd al-Barr, al-Bazzar and many others. Ibn Hazm states
that not only is the isnad unsound, but the hadith cannot be true for
two further reasons: (i) the Companions were not infallible, and hence
made mistakes, so it would be wrong to say that following any of them
leads to guidance; (ii) the comparison with the stars is wrong, for
not every star guides one through every journey! There is a different,
authentic comparison with the stars given in Sahih Muslim: the Prophet
(may Allah bless him and grant him peace) said, "The stars are the custodians
of the sky, so when the stars depart, there will come to the sky what
is promised for it (i.e. on the Day of Judgment). I am the custodian
of my Companions, so when I depart, there will come to my Companions
what is promised for them (i.e. great trials and tribulations). My Companions
are the custodians for my Ummah, so when my Companions depart, there
will come to my Ummah what is promised for it (i.e. schisms, spread
of innovations, etc.)." (4:1961, Eng. trans. IV:1344)
- No isnad exists for this hadith: al-Subki (d.
756) said, "It is not known to the scholars of Hadith, and I cannot
find an isnad for it, whether sahih, da'if, or maudu'." It, along with
the previous one, is often used to justify the following two extremes:
(i) blind following of the views of men, with no reference to the Qur'an
and Sunnah; (ii) conveniently following whichever scholar holds the
easiest view, or that most agreeable to one's desires, again without
reference to the fundamental sources.
- Numerous narrations of this hadith are found in
the collections of Abu Dawud, al-Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah, al-Hakim, Ahmad
and others: they vary in being sahih, hasan, or da'if, but the hadith
is established. Among those who have authenticated this hadith are al-Tirmidhi,
al- Hakim, al-Shatibi, Ibn Taimiyyah, Ibn al-Qayyim, al-Dhahabi, Ibn
Kathir, Ibn Hajar and al-'Iraqi. Most narrations mention the splitting-up
of the Jews and the Christians into seventy-one or seventy-two sects,
all being in the Fire except one, prior to mention of the Muslims dividing
even more. In some of the narrations, the Prophet (may Allah bless him
and grant him peace) describes the Saved Sect variously as "the Jama'ah
(community, congregation, main body)", "the largest body (al-sawad al-a'zam)"
and "that which follows what I and my Companions are upon." The hadith
does not mean that the majority of Muslims will be in the Hellfire,
for most of them ("the masses") are not involved in intentional, divisive
innovation; further, mention of the Fire does not necessarily imply
that the seventy-two sects will remain there forever, or that those
sects are disbelievers.
- Although the Mahdi is not mentioned explicitly
in the collections of al-Bukhari and Muslim, numerous sahih ahadith,
which are mutawatir in meaning, speak of the coming of the Mahdi, a
man named Muhammad b. 'Abdullah and a descendant of the Prophet (may
Allah bless him and grant him peace) through Fatimah, who will be the
Leader (Imam, Khalifah) of the Muslims, rule for seven years and fill
the world with justice and equity after it had been filled with tyranny
and oppression. He will also fight the Dajjal along with Jesus son of
Mary. The author, in his The Concept of the Mahdi among the Ahl al-Sunnah,
has named 37 scholars who collected ahadith about the Mahdi with their
own isnads and 69 later scholars who wrote in support of the concept,
compared to 8 scholars who rejected the idea. The ahadith prophesying
the Dajjal (False Christ), a one-eyed man who will have miraculous powers
and will be followed by the Jews, and the return of Jesus Christ son
of Mary (peace be upon them), who will descend in Damascus and pray
behind the Mahdi, kill the Dajjal at the gate of Lod in Palestine, break
the Cross, kill the Pig, marry and have children and live for forty
years before dying a natural death, are mutawatir in meaning. They have
been collected by al-Bukhari and Muslim, as well as other traditionists.
- Mutawatir in meaning, and collected by al- Bukhari,
Muslim and others.
- Mutawatir in meaning, and collected by al- Bukhari,
Muslim and others. Mention of the inadmissibility of intercession on
the Day of Judgment in the Qur'an, e.g. 2:48 2:123, must be understood
in the light of other verses, e.g. 20:109 and sahih ahadith. The reward
of seeing Allah for the believers is referred to in the Qur'an, e.g.
75:22-23 and 83:15. These ahadith and those of the previous two categories
were generally rejected by the classical Mu'tazilah (Rationalists),
as well by those influenced by them today, on one or more of the following
bases: (i) they contradict the Qur'an (in their view); (ii) they contradict
Reason (in their view), and (iii) they are ahad, not mutawatir, and
hence not acceptable in matters of belief (a flawed argument). Hence,
the scholars who wrote the 'aqidah (creed) of the Ahl al-Sunnah included
these concepts in it, to confirm their denial of the wrong ideas of
the Mu'tazilah. Other authentic ahadith rejected by the Mu'tazilah are
many, and include those describing the Prophet's Mi'raj (ascension to
the heavens), which are again mutawatir in meaning.
- The hadith with this wording is da'if, but its
meaning is contained in the hadith of Ibn Majah and al-Nasa'i that a
man came to the Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) and
said, "O Messenger of Allah! I intend to go on a (military) expedition,
but I have come to ask your advice." He said, "Is your mother alive?"
He said, "Yes." He said, "Then stay with her, for the Garden is under
her feet." This latter hadith is declared to be sahih by al-Hakim, al-Dhahabi
and al-Mundhiri.99
- A sahih hadith, collected by al-Bukhari, Muslim
and others.
- This hadith has many chains of narration on the
authority of more than a dozen Companions, including twenty Successors
apparently reporting from Anas alone. They are collected by Ibn Majah,
al-Baihaqi, al-Tabarani and others, but all of them are da'if, according
to Ahmad b. Hanbal, Ishaq b. Rahuwaih, Ibn 'Abd al-Barr, al- Bazzar
and others, although some scholars authenticated a few of the chains.
Al-Baihaqi said that its text is mashhur while its isnad is da'if, while
al-Hakim and Ibn al-Salah regarded it as a prime example of a mashhur
hadith which is not sahih. However, it is regarded by later scholars
of Hadith as having enough chains of narration to be strengthened to
the level of hasan or sahih, a view which is stated by al- Mizzi, al-'Iraqi,
Ibn Hajar, al-Suyuti and al- Albani.100
- This additional statement is found in a few of
the (weak) narrations of the previous hadith, and is declared as maudu'
by Ibn Hibban, Ibn al- Jauzi, al-Sakhawi and al-Albani.101
- Mentioned by al-Manjaniqi in his collection of
ahadith of older narrators reporting from younger ones, on the authority
of al-Hasan al- Basri. Al-Khatib al-Baghdadi said that it is maudu'
as a narration from the Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace),
but that it is a statement of al-Hasan al-Basri.102
- Related as marfu' by al-Baihaqi with a da'if isnad,
according to al-'Iraqi. Ibn Hajar said that it is actually a saying
of Ibrahim b. Abi 'Ablah, a Successor.103
*NB: The scholars of Hadith agree that a da'if or maudu' hadith
must not be attributed to the Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him
peace), e.g. by saying, "The Prophet said: ...", even if the meaning is
considered to be correct or if it is actually the saying of a Muslim scholar,
for that would be a way of lying about the Prophet (may Allah bless him
and grant him peace).
ENDNOTES
- Ar. Sunnah: Way, Path, Tradition, Example. See
An Introduction to the Sunnah by Suhaib Hasan (Understanding Islam Series
no. 5, published by Al-Quran Society), for Qur'anic proofs of revelation
besides the Qur'an, the importance of the Sunnah, and a brief history
of the collections of Hadith. See also Imam al- Shafi'i's al-Risalah
for the authoritative position of the Sunnah (Eng. trans., pp. 109-
116).
- related by Imam Muslim in the Introduction to his
Sahih - see Sahih Muslim (ed. M.F. 'Abdul Baqi, 5 vols., Cairo, 1374/1955),
1:15 & Sahih Muslim bi Sharh an-Nawawi (18 vols. in 6, Cairo, 1349),
1:87. The existing English translation of Sahih Muslim, by Abdul Hamid
Siddiqi, does not contain this extremely valuable Introduction.
- Ibn Abi Hatim al-Razi, Al-Jarh wa l-Ta'dil (8 vols.,
Hyderabad, 1360-1373), 1:20.
- Sahih Muslim, 1:15. See Suhaib Hasan, Criticism
of Hadith among Muslims with reference to Sunan Ibn Maja (Ta Ha publishers
/ Al-Quran Society, London, 1407/1986), pp. 15-17 for discussion of
this statement of Ibn Sirin.
- Remarks like these are exceptions from the basic
Islamic prohibition of backbiting (ghibah) another Muslim, even if the
statement is true. Such exceptions are allowed, even obligatory in some
cases, where general benefit to the Muslim public is at stake, such
as knowing which ahadith are authentic. See e.g. Riyad al- Salihin of
al-Nawawi, Chapter on Backbiting, for the justification for certain
types of backbiting from the Qur'an and Sunnah.
- Muhammad Adib Salih, Lamahat fi Usul al-Hadith
(2nd ed., al-Maktab al-Islami, Beirut, 1389), p. 143.
- Tahir b. Ahmad al-Jaza'iri, Taujih al-Nazar ila
Usul al-Nazar (Maktaba 'Ilmiyyah, Madinah, N.D.), p. 68.
- Muhammad b. 'Abdullah al-Hakim, Ma'rifah 'Ulum
al-Hadith (ed. Mu'azzam Husain, Cairo, 1937), p. 17.
- ibid.
- Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti, Tadrib al-Rawi (ed. A.A.
Latif, 1st ed., Cairo, 1379/1959), 1:197.
- Al-Dhahabi, Talkhis al-Mustadrak (printed with
Mustadrak al-Hakim, 4 vols., Hyderabad), 3:176.
- Abu 'l-Fida' 'Imad al-Din Ibn Kathir, Tafsir al-Qur'an
al-Azim (4 vols., Cairo, N.D.), 1:80.
- Yusuf b. 'Abdullah Ibn 'Abdul Barr, Tajrid al-
Tamhid lima fi l-Muwatta' min al-Asanid (Cairo, 1350), 1:2.
- ibid.
- al-Suyuti, 1:198.
- For the discussion in detail, see al-Shafi'i,
al-Risalah (ed. Ahmad Shakir, Cairo, 1358/1940, pp. 461-470; English
translation: M. Khadduri, 2nd ed., Islamic Texts Society, Cambridge,
1987, pp. 279-284, where the mursal hadith has been translated as "interrupted
tradition").
- al-Suyuti, 1:199; Muhammad b. Mustafa al- Ghadamsi,
Al-Mursal min al-Hadith (Darif Ltd., London, N.D.), p.71.
- Ibn al-Qayyim, I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in (2nd ed., 4
vols. in 2, Dar al-Fikr, Beirut, 1397/1977), 1:31.
- Ibn Hazm, Al-Ihkam fi Usul al-Ahkam (Matba'ah
al-Sa'adah, Cairo, 1345), 2:135.
- Al-Hazimi, Shurut al-A'immah al-Khamsah (ed. M.Z.
al-Kauthari, Cairo, N.D.), p. 45.
- According to the different interpretations of
this verse, "they" here could refer to those who stay behind, or those
who go forth.
- al-Hakim, p. 26.
- ibid.
- Al-Khatib al-Baghdadi, Al-Kifayah fi 'Ilm al-
Riwayah (Hyderabad, 1357), p. 387.
- ibid., pp. 411-413.
- Zain al-Din al-'Iraqi, Al-Taqyid wa 'l-Idah Sharh
Muqaddimah Ibn al-Salah (al-Maktabah al- Salafiyyahh, Madinah, 1389/1969),
p. 72
- Ibn Taymiyyah, Minhaj al-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah
fi Naqd Kalam al-Shi'ah wa 'l-Qadariyyah (al- Maktabah al-Amiriyyah,
Bulaq, 1322), 4:117.
- Al-Dhahabi, Al-Muqizah (Maktab al-Matbu'at al-
Islamiyyah, Halab, 1405), p. 40.
- al-Jaza'iri, p. 33.
- ibid.
- Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani, Sharh Nukhbah al-Fikr
(ed. M. 'Aud & M.G. Sabbagh, Damascus, 1410/1990), pp. 8-9.
- al-Jaza'iri, p. 49; Muhammad b. Isma'il al- Amir
al-San'ani, Taudih al-Afkar (2 vols. ed. M.M. 'Abdul Hamid, Cairo, 1366),
2:405.
- al-San'ani, 2:409.
- al-Hakim, pp. 96-102.
- al-San'ani, 2:455.
- al-'Iraqi, p. 268.
- al-San'ani, 2:406.
- al-'Iraqi, p. 96.
- ibid.
- Ibn Hajar, Tabaqat al-Mudallisin (Cairo, 1322),
p. 7f.
- al-'Iraqi, p. 98.
- al-Hakim, pp. 30-34.
- ibid., p. 119.
- Ibn Kathir, Ikhtisar 'Ulum al-Hadith (ed. Ahmad
Shakir, 2nd imp., Cairo, 1951), p. 57.
- al-Suyuti, 1:235; M. A. Salih, p. 260.
- al-San'ani, 2:3.
- ibid., 2:6.
- al-Khatib, p. 431.
- Ibn Kathir, Tafsir, 4:349.
- Ibn Kathir, Ikhtisar, p. 62.
- al-Suyuti, 1:248.
- al-Hakim, p. 39.
- al-'Iraqi, p. 129f.
- al-Suyuti, 1:274.
- Ibn Kathir, Ikhtisar, p. 72.
- ibid.
- Ibn 'Abdul Barr, Al-Tamhid, 3:32, as quoted by
Luqman al-Salafi, Ihtimam al-Muhaddithin bi Naqd al-Hadith, p. 381f.
- Ibn Kathir, Ikhtisar, p. 88.
- ibid., p. 87.
- Shams al-Din Muhammad b. 'Abd al-Rahman al- Sakhawi,
Fath al-Mughith Sharh Alfiyyah al- Hadith li 'l-'Iraqi (Lucknow, N.D.),
1:278.
- 'Uthman b. 'Abd al-Rahman al-Dimashqi Ibn al-
Salah, 'Ulum al-Hadith (commonly known as Muqaddimah, ed. al-Tabbakh,
Halab, 1350), p. 116.
- 'Ali b. 'Abdullah b. Ja'far Ibn al-Madini, Kitab
al-'Ilal, p. 58. Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani mentions that the Imams of Hadith
have agreed that al-Hasan al-Basri did not hear a single word from 'Ali.
- Sahih Muslim, 4:2149 (English transl., IV:1462,
Sharh Nawawi, 17:133).
- Ibn Taimiyyah, Majmu' Fatawa (37 vols., ed. 'Abd
al-Rahman b. Qasim & his son Muhammad, Riyad, 1398), 18:18f. Ibn Taimiyyah
mentions that Imam Muslim's authentication of this hadith is supported
by Abu Bakr al-Anbari & Ibn al- Jauzi, whereas al-Baihaqi supports those
who disparaged it. Al-Albani says that it was Ibn al-Madini who criticised
it, whereas Ibn Ma'in did not (the latter was known to be very strict,
both of them were shaikhs of al-Bukhari). He further says that the hadith
is sahih, and does not contradict the Qur'an, contrary to the probable
view of the scholars who criticised the hadith, since what is mentioned
in the Qur'an is the creation of the heavens and the earth in six days,
each of which may be like a thousand years, whereas the hadith refers
to the creation of the earth only, in days which are shorter than those
referred to in the Qur'an (Silsilah al-Ahadith as-Sahihah, no. 1833).
- al-Dhahabi, p. 27.
- al-Shafi'i, p. 370f (Eng. trans., pp. 239- 240).
- al-Dhahabi, p. 24.
- al-Nawawi, Muqaddimah, p. 14.
- al-Tibi, al-Husain b. 'Abdullah, al-Khulasah fi
Usul al-Hadith (ed. Subhi al-Samarra'i, Baghdad, 1391), p. 36.
- ibid., p. 38.
- al-Nawawi, Muqaddimah, p. 43.
- al-Dhahabi, p. 26.
- ibid., pp. 32-33.
- al-Albani, Silsilah al-Ahadith al-Sahihah, no.
62.
- al-Jaza'iri, p. 149.
- al-Sakhawi, 1:99.
- al-Dhahabi, pp. 33-34.
- ibid., p. 36.
- al-Sakhawi, 1:264.
- ibid., 1:275.
- al-Nawawi, Taqrib, 1:275.
- see Ibn al-Qayyim, al-Manar al-Munif fi 'l- Sahih
wa 'l-Da'if (ed. A.F. Abu Ghuddah, Lahore, 1402/1982), pp. 102-105 for
a fuller discussion. Ibn al-Qayyim mentions more than ten clear indications
of the forgery of the document, which the Jews repeatedly attempted
to use to deceive the Muslims over the centuries, but each time a scholar
of Hadith intervened to point out the forgery - such incidents occurred
with Ibn Jarir al-Tabari (d. 310), al-Khatib al-Baghdadi (d. 463) and
Ibn Taimiyyah (d. 728), who spat on the document as it was unfolded
from beneath its silken covers.
- Suhaib Hasan, Criticism of Hadith, pp. 35-44.
- The Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him
peace) allowed such narrations, but they are not to be confirmed nor
denied, except for what is confirmed or denied by the Qur'an and Sunnah.
See e.g. An Introduction to the Principles of Tafseer of Ibn Taimiyyah
(trans. M.A.H. Ansari, Al-Hidaayah, Birmingham, 1414/1993), pp. 56-58.
- ibid., p. 156.
- see Muqaddimah Ibn al-Salah.
- Fatawa Ibn Taimiyyah, 6:379-382.
- Isma'il b. Muhammad al-'Ijlouni, Kashf al- Khafa'
(2 vols. in 1, Cairo/Aleppo, N.D.), no. 2016.
- Al-Albani, Silsilah al-Ahadith al-Da'ifah, no.
282.
- Kashf al-Khafa', no. 2256.
- Sahih al-Jami' al-Saghir, no. 2163; Silsilah al-Ahadith
al-Sahihah, no. 1691.
- Kashf al-Khafa', no. 2532; Al-Da'ifah, no. 66.
- Al-Da'ifah, no. 58.
- Kashf al-Khafa', no. 1102; Al-Da'ifah, no. 36.
- Al-Sahihah, no. 1761.
- Kashf al-Khafa', no. 2130.
- Kashf al-Khafa', no. 618.
- Da'if al-Jami' al-Saghir, nos. 1410, 1416.
- Kashf al-Khafa', no. 1078; Al-Da'ifah, no. 593.
- Kashf al-Khafa', no. 1665; Sahih al-Jami' al-
Saghir, nos. 3913-4.
- Al-Da'ifah, no. 416; Da'if al-Jami' al- Saghir,
nos. 1005-6.
- Kashf al-Khafa', no. 2276.
- Kashf al-Khafa', no. 1362.
|